Listed In: Other Physicians and Surgeons Professionals
Dr. Heivand earned a Bachelor of Science degree in Physiology & Neurosciences and a Bachelor of Arts degree in History from UC San Diego. He earned his medical degree from St. George's University and completed his internship and residency in Internal Medicine at Lenox Hill Hospital in New York City… Dr. Heivand earned a Bachelor of Science degree in Physiology & Neurosciences and a Bachelor of Arts degree in History from UC San Diego. He earned his medical degree from St. George's University and completed his internship and residency in Internal Medicine at Lenox Hill Hospital in New York City where he was chosen to serve as a Chief Medical Resident. Dr. Heivand's priority is to keep his patients healthy by empowering them with the knowledge and means to prevent chronic illnesses. Read more
By Robert Scott on March 12, 2026 Verified by Google
Summary of my experience:
• Waited 109 days for an appointment
• Appointment was changed without notifying me
• I arrived and was told I had cancelled it, which was not true
• My copay was charged to my credit card anyway
• Multiple attempts were required just to reach the clinic manager
I am sharing this review to describe my personal experience as a patient at the UCLA Health Thousand Oaks clinic so that others can understand what occurred and make their own decisions.
I scheduled an appointment with Dr. Neema Heivand on November 21, and the earliest available appointment date I was given was March 10. That meant waiting 109 days for the visit. Like many patients, I accepted the long wait assuming that once the appointment finally arrived the process would be straightforward.
Prior to the visit I received reminder messages confirming the March 10 appointment. I also completed the required online paperwork and entered my credit card information for the copay as requested.
When I arrived at the office on the day of the appointment, the front desk informed me that my appointment was not scheduled for that day and that it had been moved to March 18. This was the first time I had heard that the appointment had been changed.
I showed the staff the reminder messages confirming the March 10 appointment. At that point I was told that the appointment had been changed the day before. However, I had received no phone call, voicemail, text message, or email notifying me of any change.
Instead of acknowledging that a scheduling error may have occurred, the situation became frustrating. During the conversation I was told that I had cancelled the appointment, which, is simply not what happened.
To make matters even more confusing, I later discovered that my credit card had been charged the copay the day before the appointment, even though the office was now stating that the appointment had been moved and I was not being seen that day.
After waiting 109 days for this appointment, I arrived on time only to be told the appointment no longer existed, was told I had cancelled it, and later saw that my card had already been charged the copay.
I attempted to resolve the situation by contacting the clinic manager, Anahit Khacheryan, and left several messages. It took quite some time before I finally received a response. When I did hear back, the discussion felt focused on explaining away the situation rather than acknowledging the obvious problems with how the scheduling and communication had been handled.
I want to be clear that I fully understand that physicians sometimes become ill and schedules occasionally change. That is part of healthcare. What was disappointing here was not the change itself, but the lack of communication and the way the situation was handled when I arrived after waiting more than three months for the appointment.
Patients who wait that long for care reasonably expect clear communication, professionalism, and basic accountability when something changes.
Because UCLA Health uses an electronic scheduling system, the timeline of this situation should be easy to verify. The system should show when the appointment was changed, whether any notification was actually sent to the patient, and why a copay was processed for a visit that did not occur. I would welcome the office reviewing those records so the facts of what happened can be clarified.
I hope the clinic reviews its scheduling and communication procedures so that other patients do not experience the same situation.
If someone from UCLA Health administration or the clinic leadership would like to review this situation and help clarify what occurred, I would welcome that conversation.
By Mick on April 6, 2023 Verified by Google
Saw Dr Heivand for high Blood Pressure. Perhaps the most sensitive and caring Dr. I’ve ever met with. Highly recommend.
By Sai Nagin on January 7, 2023 Verified by Google
The nurse took me in right away. Dr. Heivand is approachable and easy to talk to. He spent good amount of time with me and I felt comfortable talking to him. I highly recommend Dr. Heivand and I will definitely visit him again.
By Kelly Campbell on May 9, 2022 Verified by Google
I have been seeing Dr Heivand for about a year and a half. He is thorough, kind, generous with his time and very attentive. My appointments have always run in time and the office staff and nurses are great.
By Ajomgz Gaming on June 8, 2021 Verified by Google
I love Dr Heivand. He is busy, but is always on time and if he’s not available, UCLA always refers me to an in practice colleague if I urgently need to see a doctor.
If you see the one star review, please see how that reviewer has a habit of giving bad reviews.
Showing the overall rating from Google. Load more reviews to see individual Google reviews.